Author: ivan

  • Story box(es)

    Story box(es)

    It’s been another long hiatus, for which I can only apologise to my solitary reader. I’ve been busy elsewhere but – as with many people – realising that the internet is not what it once was. So this is a little attempt at reclaiming a space, or if nothing else my copyright, of things online.

    This idea started a very long time ago, but for various reasons I never quite got around to making an edition until now. The idea of a story box is part game, part book, part mystery. It’s very loosely inspired by Rory’s Story Cubes and from stories-as-games I’ve developed with both my own children and the MQ Art Club.

    Story box elements ready for cutting, folding and sticking
    Story box contents ready for cutting, folding and sticking

    This particular box – “Brøt – Operation Black Sheep” contains 23 different elements that when ‘read’ together form a narrative. And a ‘reading’ of the contents is included in the box, but this may spark more questions than answers. It also – I hope – makes it clear that there are other ways to tell the story, other ways to interpret the objects. And what I’d love is to hear from ‘readers’ what they make of it, how they interpret the story..

    Contents list
    Contents list / evidence file index

    This was tremendous fun to make, and includes something like ten different types of paper and card.

    Made in an edition of four, with three still available for sale. Purchase through the shop.

  • Onwards

    Gosh. Tempus fugit. The last few months have not been conducive to making art for a number of reasons, but I’m trying to remedy that in earnest now. I’ve been lucky to receive an unexpected windfall from an uncle who was instrumental in my childhood exploration of ideas and mediums.

    I remember vividly the ‘chinese’ painting set we explored in Granny’s living room. We painted Harlequin ducks from a small instruction leaflet, with the to-me revolutionary principle of loading a brush with two colours to create a blend/gradient. He was a talented artist – much better than I am – and particularly skilled with pencil drawing. If I’m not confusing my uncles he did memorable copies of da Vinci’s Vitrivian Man, and Dali’s Metamorphosis of Narcissus that lingers in the memory. So not shy of taking things on, and a little more ambitious than my ‘copy artists off Instagram’ style.

    I’ve added the funds he left me to the various tools, materials and ideas that I inherited from my mum. At the risk of becoming a collector rather than an artist I’ve added a few ‘nice-to-haves’ to my equipment list –

    • Cricut (the intention is to make stencils and possibly cut onlays directly from patterns);
    • heated typeholder (another absurd auction bid to complement the equally unused Marshall blocking press from the same source);
    • set of handle letters (York 30pt). The perennial challenge of attending SoB events in person is not walking away with empty wallet;
    • small brass cube from Arthur Green (see above);
    • set of Henry Taylor chisels;
    • a rather cute (and fortunately functional) miniature low-angle block plane;
    • a pair of sewing frames – I resisted for five years, which is a good effort.
    • (as part of a kit sent by Jeff Peachey) a large file, a rasp, scraper and a burnisher;
    • various Dremel bits and pieces.
    Heated typeholder equipment

    Basically other than the cube these purchases mean I’m exploring a bit more – historic book structures – particularly with wooden boards, and continuing to accumulate tools to improve my finishing options.

    As part of my continuing obsession with Ben Elbel’s structures I’ve also added to my paper stores – some interesting textured papers from GF Smith (including a fake leather which is really tactile); some gorgeous Hannemuhle for end papers, and a range of different Zerkall Ingres papers – possibly for print, more likely for endpapers. My plan chest drawers are now stuffed full. And I need to remember that…. make things! Use the materials!

    I’ve also taken a conscious decision to ‘go back to school’. While I enjoy Eduardo Tarrico’s and Susana Dominguez’ online courses, there’s nothing like live interaction with a tutor, and being able to ask questions while I’m making mistakes learning. To that end I took a couple of remote courses with US tutors last year – Karen Hanmer’s leather decoration course, plus Jeff Peachey’s toolmaking course – which worked up to a point. The latter was probably wasted on me – I simply didn’t have a firm enough idea as to what I would like to make tool-wise (other than ticking ‘do a Peachey course’ off my bookbinding bucket list).

    I’ve been struggling with time and motivation in most areas of my life – alongside working, and studying for a Masters, I’ve also become a UEFA C qualified coach (that sounds grand, it’s the lowest level grassroots football coaching qualification) and so the energy, patience and concentration to do ‘proper’ craft work is often lacking. But it’s good for me, and I enjoy it most of the time, so I’ve opted to return to try and do more ‘deliberate practice’ binding. So I’m spending the best part of three months doing one evening a week with Karen via Zoom (as part of her BiblioTech course examining the history of the book through various different structures), and in-person studio work with Mark (Cockram) at Studio 5 – the aim here is to get confident enough to enter competitions.

    This should mean that I have time on Tuesday evenings as I wait for the time difference to unwind to perhaps organise my thoughts and document a bit more progress. Not for anyone else’s benefit. For me. And in honour of those who are no longer with us.

  • I’m post or?

    I’ve had a number of opportunities to think about knowledge and the accumulation of expertise in the past week. Ignoring the highly VUCA world we live in (I love that expression ‘volatile, uncertain, complex and ambiguous’. I’ve described myself at various times professionally – and sometimes unprofessionally – as ‘a complexity vortex’. It’s very pleasing to know that there is a Harvard Business Review-approved term for it. And obviously that it is an acronym that you have to look up every time you use it because it’s easier to use VUCA as a throwaway term that will meet at least one condition in any particular environment), pretty much every area of my life. (And of course what I really want to do now is look up how to add footnotes to blocks in this editor, because in the unlikely event anyone reads this, then my poor reader is very quickly going to lose whatever thread I had to begin with. VUCA blogging.)

    Work has been challenging. I’m motivated by making things better – formally speaking that’s to improve capabilities through leveraging the work of others – be that ideas, models or tools. I spend a lot of time seeing people build triangular wheels. I dare say I’ve built my fair share too. But it’s extra hard at the moment. It’s hard when you see things others don’t – whether these are dragons, unicorns, or numbers. Anyway, not the time or the place.

    I’m studying for an MSc. This is largely to try and remove some lifelong scars from my undergraduate days. It shouldn’t really matter what badges you have, but for me, for now, it does – which is tedious as the impacts of studying are nearly all negative. Results so far are… mixed. The process is interesting, but the material is… well… academic. I’m used to explaining things, or writing proposals, or provocations. I’m used to critiquing the competition (or more often, ‘us’). I’m not used to thinking about what other people’s viewpoints would make of the same material. I’m used to applying that viewpoint, but not simply for the sake of doing it. Not very purposeful.

    I haven’t historically posted about anything other than fiction or poetry on this blog (if I’ve posted anything), but I’ve just joined an artist’s book group run by a keen member of the Society of Bookbinders and that was a schooling in itself. While I was showing some feeble attempts at non-traditional structures and wittering on about not having a voice, a couple of much more established artists talked in depth about their motivation, rationale, execution and response. I think I’m a bit better at appreciating experience nowadays but it was hard not to feel embarrassed.

    Which leads on to my latest adventure in impostor syndrome, as a team leader for a girls’ football team. One of the founding principles of this club is to resist coaching as much as possible and let the girls work things out for themselves. And it’s a fascinating process to watch and be part of – I mean it’s not as if they are not coached, but there’s none of the micro-management that I’m used to from my own football days (or indeed, that any armchair viewer/season ticket holder will feel entitled to do). And I think part of this philosophy is a much healthier approach to managing shame.

    There should be no shame in not knowing. There should only be shame in a lack of desire to learn, to grow. I fully agree with the club that we criticise effort not ability. Yet most of my life (this is a blog, it’s meant to be narcissistic) I have felt deep shame at getting things wrong, or more destructively – for the potential of getting something wrong. I’ve been known to leave a room when other people do something stupid on a television programme I’m watching. It’s a visceral reaction which I find very difficult to control. I guess Steve Peters would have something to say about my perception of self and the troop. But there are definitely aspects of my psyche that use shame as a stimulus – I wonder if that’s an instinctive thing or not. For example, I will make ‘better’ (or at least more conscious) art for the next meeting of the artists’ book group.

    It’s also ironic that I spend at least part of my professional life ’embarrassing’ myself. Taking chances. Being wrong. Learning, trying, failing. More often than not I’m actually ‘taking’ that shame for someone else. My job is to hand over once things are (more) certain – I remove or control some VUCA. But this is not a behaviour I’m used to applying in personal, artistic or social contexts. Is that simply competence? Or practice? Or necessity?

    Hmm. Been thinking about that last bit. I’m happy to be the clown, to volunteer when others don’t / won’t. I’m often deeply embarrassed about both types of behaviour. Again I guess it’s a chimp management thing – and it’s definitely an overthinking thing.

    Speaking of overthinking, it’s time to get on with the day, and put on my clown suit.

  • Meander

    I’m going to try and focus on deliberate practice as explained in Anderson’s Peak . I have been attempting to follow the audiobook of The Creative Habit by Twyla Tharp but I’m not getting much value from it.

    The winding road to reinvention

    I don’t really have a problem being creative, and if I’m honest with myself I can sustain productivity ‘when it matters’ – what I need to get better at is ‘when it matters less’ and also in being creative in a growth way.

    I continue to mess around at the foothills of creative skills development – having now amassed enough materials to run a small art shop, and enough instructional material to make my attempts at moderating my children’s consumption habits a total mockery. The challenge is not to constantly start again, but to push myself into new things.

    I guess the analogy is with running. You can run for various reasons – mental health, it helps you work through problems, physical sensation, as part of a wider programme, towards a set goal…. (and stretching the analogy arguably once you have a sufficient base level you can do more ambitious things without injury to body or pride). I do most of my art because it makes me happy. Now I need to work on my ability for art to make me feel good about myself – different concepts.

    I find the creative process soothing. Recently, while listening to one of my kids humming incessantly and the other singing while building LEGO (the ‘All I wanna do is poop’ song, an instant classic, highly recommended) – I recognised the trait in myself – when I’m happy I make ‘music’. Or more usually, I do something with one part of my brain – write, make – while listening to music. But sound is critical to my ‘process’.

    I’ve reflected a few times how the feeling of being ‘enclosed’ in my studio is part of my enjoyment. I prefer (or maybe I simply associate more) with working in the dark, listening to (mostly) obscure music on BBC 6 Music. The joy of working in the studio outside conventional office hours is basically the playlist is eclectic.

    Which is all a very long-winded way of saying that last night I made some endpapers for a couple of Bradel notebooks; cut enough millboard down to make a further five; and used the offcut from the Canson endpapers to begin making a modified Shrigley. And during the work I heard this, and was enchanted:

    Katherine Priddy is on tour with Richard Thompson in the UK at the moment (2021)

    Although to think I am reinventing myself as a folkie is probably a step too far. But what a beautiful voice.

  • Identifying as…

    Thog


    August 2021

    Time to refocus this blog on the activites I’m currently engaged in – linocut, bookbinding and occasional art. I’m hoping that in doing so I will reignite my writing mojo. But we shall see.

  • August 2021 Reflections – folding

    Accordions, onions, blizzards and other folding structures

    In the past few weeks I’ve been broadening my understanding of structures. Last year Ben Elbel ran a promotion through Designer Bookbinders which led to be buying two tutorials + materials – I had a really tough time choosing but in the end went for an aesthetic (Onion) and an introduction to (sewn) albums (Shrigley).

    Shrigley binding
    Shrigley binding housing photos of my favourite linocut print

    On the Shrigley I had a few issues with the accordion – this was a poor choice of mine to start with the kit rather than waste materials. I also don’t quite understand the back board connection – it doesn’t look as elegant as the rest of the structure.

    The squash triangle fold (as I now know it’s name) is particularly useful as it holds material really simply and all you need is to have a border around your page. Like having inbuilt photo mounts – I will try and incorporate this feature into a ‘normal’ section soon, see how that plays out. I guess it would add a bit of bulk so you’re not going to want to overdo it.

    Photo of Onion binding
    Onion binding using scrap materials

    The Onion binding was more successful even though the folds are much smaller. This time I did use spare materials, although this was also a minor challenge as the heavier weight paper (230gsm) I bought from a Wayzgoose doesn’t take folds well (it crumples) and the green ‘lighter’ paper (also Wayzgoose, it’s thinner but stiffer than the white) is possibly more dense. It’s a relatively easy structure to do ‘ok’ and a really hard structure to make it look really sharp.

    Both structures use only paper and cardstock, so this also gave me an excuse to buy some more exotic papers from G F Smith. I’m particularly looking forward to using their leather effect heavier papers.

    Having started at the more difficult end, I then decided to begin working through Hedi Kyle’s Art of the Fold as some of Bookbindingoutofthebox structures have their origins there. So far these are all maquettes using cartridge paper and other bits of scrap.

    Photo of accordion paper structures
    Top left is a simple accordion with pocket. Top right is accordion with jacket, bottom is accordion with ‘school’ cover.

    These accordion structures are addictive and simple to make. Other than a couple of measurements these are also simple enough to do with the children, and C has been busy making several versions of the accordion for her new teacher, friends etc., It always makes me very happy when they get enthused by any form of bookbinding or paper craft. We did end up making an interlocking flag book, but I prefer the ‘pocket’ structures.

    The header image shows the blizzard structure I then mocked up using GF Smith Everyday 100 gsm and some imitation parchment paper. I printed an old map of Richmond on the accordion (love the way the Epson can print oversize lengths) and cut up photos of some doctored vintage postcards of my local area. A bit crude in execution but enough to give me ideas….

  • Documentary and inventories

    A couple of displacement activities this week – new arrivals in the paper department (from GF Smith) and collating all my linocut blocks and remaining prints of the last 18 months. This led to a rather pleasing reminder that I’ve created quite a few prints, and that in turn led me to look at the shelves and try and assess the number of different binding (styles) I’ve done.

    • Pamphlet binding
    • Flatback multi-section
    • Multi-section case
    • Bradel
    • Disappearing spine Bradel (Cockram)
    • Library style (English)
    • Library style (Tarrico)
    • Jean de Gonet (Tarrico)
    • Crown / Star (Kyle)
    • Drum
    • Longstitch
    • Japanese (variation)
    • Crisscross / Belgian
    • Shrigley (Elbel)
    • Onion (Elbel)

    Which was another pleasant surprise, although I think I’m only competent at perhaps three of these (and some I’ve only done once).

    The point really is that I haven’t been doing a great job of documenting my progress in any formal sense, and perhaps posting will encourage me to be a bit more ‘formal’ about it. We shall see.

  • From the studio…

    From the studio…

    A selection of photographs of some of my recent work or new things to have arrived in the studio/bindery.

  • Creative Writing – survival of the fittest

    [Ivan’s note – I found this post sitting in draft state. It had lain dormant since early 2012. I post it because I am always slightly bemused, often plain embarrassed, and occasionally delighted, by things I used to think / feel / say. An awful lot of *stuff* has happened since, not least another child, and three of my classmates being published. Which in itself casts a different light/shadow/pall/nappy-changing routine over these words].

    It’s been over a month now since I finished the second creative writing course run by Curtis Brown (Curtis Brown Creative).

    Some background:

    I have always wanted to be a writer. This is partly because it is something I have always been told I’m good at, and partly because it is something I enjoy doing. These two things are inextricably linked. However, as the world and his dog on the internet (with his iBone or Woofberry, no doubt) will tell you, it is one thing to amuse your friends, it is quite another to get them to buy you a drink. I’m sorry, that should have read ‘it is quite another to persuade another human bean to give you money in exchange for words wot you have ritten’.

    Things, not least my self-discipline and self-confidence, kept getting in the way. Bathos, that’s another thing. Ooh, and baths. Or more strictly, alcohol. Baths of booze. But that’s another story.

    My last formal employer had an education fund. This was very wise of them. All my other formal employers have had Personal Development sessions with life coaches and all sorts (not the licorice kind, alas, the fancy business card’n bullshit brigade). This has made me – indirectly – leave my then employer because I felt so Personally Developed that I could do Better Things. Anyway, the education fund meant I got to go on an Arvon course.

    If you’ve never been on one and you want to be a writer, book yourself on one at once. Please stop reading this self-justifying drivel and do it. Their brochure is here. It changed my life. For the first time, I was surrounded by people who wanted to write. And cows. The cows didn’t want to write. I suspect that is why we may have eaten one of them. I digress. It was brilliant. Fun, cosy, morning pages, evening readings, knit your own yoghurt and laugh at skipping the visiting lecturer’s Taking It All A Bit Seriously With The Hippy Shit Talk.

    It gave me a push. I left full-time work. I wrote most of Tom’s Universe by being chained to a desk and going places with no internet. The bollocking internet is now creeping everywhere, even the wilds of Devon. I digress again.

    I finished the novel and sent it off to friends. Then I committed an absolute cardinal sin. I queried agents. I’ve been buying The Writer’s Handbook or Writers’ And Artists’ Yearbook every year since about 1990. I call it my tax on ambition. I was desperate to use it in anger.

    Two weeks later two form rejections came back. Six months later the agent I wanted eventually sent it back. By then I’d read it, and read all my friends’ criticisms. I was mortified. Bits of it were ok. But bits of it – most of it – was utter bilge. And it simply did not hang together as a story. The plot wandered all over the place, characters repeated themselves ad nauseam, the leads were unlikeable, the denouement too hollywood…. In short, it was a first novel. Self-indulgent twaddle. Like this blog post.

    I started to attend the London Writers’ Club Live events, where an author/agent/publisher (and if you were unlucky publicist (kidding!)) comes to give a speech about ‘the biz’. I started to appreciate the sheer scale of the unfathomable unlikelihood of Tom’s Universe ever being published. I won some kind of twatter contest for one of their courses, and did a telephone-based thing with four deathly silent types and a chatty girl from Oz. I realised, shock horror, that what I thought was entirely mainstream was in fact literary. I didn’t read literary fiction. I had stopped reading almost all genres except crime.

    So, I did something about it. I bought or read all the recent Desmond Elliot Prize winners. I subscribed to Granta (sigh). I tried very hard to like some beautifully written but deathly dull books. I (shock) didn’t finish every book I started – a cardinal sin in my world. I slowly begun to change what I was writing, and dreamt up The God of Onions. It opened with a bit of kitchen sink drama. Literally.

    At the same time, there was a new kid in the creative writing school town. Curtis Brown Creative – the first course to be run by a literary agency, and with the promise of commercial feedback on your work. I had always wanted to work with them, or rather Jonny Geller, because he represented my favourite author – Michael Marshall Smith. (As it happens, this is no longer the case, but it did lead me to contacting Michael and having a brief email correspondence with him, which was A Big Fucking Deal to me). I digress.

    I applied. I failed to make the cut – I was told I was down to the last 20, they would take 15. I was, as they say, sick as a parrot. I thought about giving up completely.

    Then they announced they were running it again. Hurrah! Now I could write something, get accepted and then turn THEM down. Hurrah! I decided that if I was going to write another book, it was at least going to be a book I would enjoy writing. I’ve always wanted to be the next Douglas Adams (how many have fallen at this hurdle?). So I wrote some old nonsense on the day the course deadline expired.

    Unexpectedly, I was offered a place. Completely to everyone’s expectations, my earlier enthusiasm to thumb my nose at them disappeared. Fired up, I wrote 35k words before the course started.

    The course itself? Bloody hard work. It coincided with the birth of my first child, root canal surgery, the near-fatal collapse of my freelance business and well, crises of every possible angsty type. I made next to no ‘real’ progress with the word count – constantly having to return to the start to prepare submissions to tutorials, or for workshops, or the submission package for the critique at the end of the course. It was incredibly frustrating – a constant process of two steps forward and N steps back, where N was always a higher number than you wanted it to be.

    Three things made/make this course unique:

    • the peer group workshops. By the end of the course I had critiqued 28 pieces of work and had mine critiqued twice. It’s very hard not to learn something from the process.
    • the industry seminars. From the eye-popping speech from Jeffrey Archer, to the potty mouth of Jojo Moyes (kidding!) through the stars – sung and unsung – of Curtis Brown itself and some of their industry contacts. The basic message was relentless. It’s tough out there. Toughen up, work harder, work smarter.
    • the pastoral role of the workshop leaders. In many respects there isn’t a lot to learn about creative writing. You risk turning it into woodwork, rather than craft. But the care and focus of Anna and Chris was exemplary. And often brutal.

    I was expecting to add a fourth here. The agent critique was what had sold the course to many of us. Curtis Brown can’t take us all on. In just two cohorts of students, it will have seen more prospective debut authors than it takes on in the normal course of events over several years. We were assigned an agent reader at random, with some happier with their choices than others. I was very happy with mine. And before I go any further, I was very happy with my readthrough, in the Ronseal sense. But what effectively happened is I got a 45 minute rejection ‘talk’, instead of a form rejection letter. Think back to the last time someone broke off a relationship with you – 45 minutes is an awful long time

    Fellow student Sarah’s reflections are on her blog.

  • Writer vs storyteller

    An interesting conundrum from last week’s visit from Major Author – do I want to be a ‘writer’ or a ‘storyteller’. The implication being that ‘writers’ are usually not commercially successful, only admired by their peers, but they may collect a few baubles along the way. Whereas a ‘storyteller’ will have a career, audience, and money.

    I went into the talk thinking I wouldn’t agree with anything Major Author would say (almost as a matter of principle). I thought I would find it good theatre (I did) but dismiss the author’s way of doing things as easily as I have dismissed their work to date. I certainly don’t agree with the distinction between the two (writer/story-teller) – but perhaps I’m being naive.

    For the most part, the talk went as expected – lots of grandstanding, a little boasting, light on detail and strong on personality. And yes, that was all there. But then they went through a writing exercise they’d undertaken. And the embarrassment gene kicked in and I thought it was going to be shoot under the desk time. But it wasn’t – at all. The seriousness which MA took it (both in having done the exercise – ‘drive’ being one of the key impressions of the night – and also the care with which they explained how they’d chosen words or phrases) really drove home three things:

    • Every word matters
    • Keep the reader wanting more. Never leave them satisfied.
    • And most contentiously, don’t always know where you’re going to end up. That is what the second / third/ Nth draft is for. In MA’s own words ‘if I know where I’m going, I will give it away – I will spoil the surprise.’

    As someone who despairs at ever finishing this specific draft, the idea of ‘wasted’ words fills me with dread. We had Other Major Author in the week before, and they’d cut 130k words from the latest draft over the course of a year. Madness!

    But… but… but. I’ve been examining my manuscript, and been thinking about my process and ‘what kind of writer do I want to be’ (simple answer – the published kind)? And I’m slightly horrified to find myself more and more thinking along Major Author lines. Not that I suddenly start writing sagas or poor-boy-come-good-against-the-odds type things, but there is a lot to be said for their basic approach. Write and enjoy yourself. Entertain people. And make it work in the second draft. Or third. Fourth etc. Think about how you’re ending each para, each chapter. Revise, revise, revise until it works (MA also did this with their speech, and it’s something I’m well aware I do with my ‘jokes’) Make dialogue do the heavy lifting. Think hard before wasting time and effort describing things. If you need to simplify your language to get someone to turn the page, then do it….

    I have bigger issues – principally whether I’m writing science fiction (well, cyberpunk or some new form of cyberpunk that allows for social networks – cyberspunk (HA!) or soc-sci-fi?)  – or whether I’m writing dystopian literary fiction.

    I’m trying to write accessibly, but maybe the plot itself is too far out? I’m trying to write a funny story, that is also gripping. I’m not sure the two things are compatible. It’s certainly a hard sell…. Decisions, decisions….

    Am I a writer? Or am I a story-teller?