Posts Tagged ‘certificate’

Ritting routine

Thursday, October 29th, 2009

I am almost a writer, I feel. In that I feel a lit­tle more like a writer than yes­ter­day, last week, last month. Although, never hav­ing been one before, I am not entirely sure what it should feel like. I mean, by the same def­i­n­i­tion,  I also feel more like a bear, because I am look­ing for excuses to hiber­nate, punc­tu­ated by adven­tures in mar­malade and/or honey. Plus I have very lit­tle brain. Trust me. I’ve for­got­ten if I had any toast this morning.

Bet­ter have some more to make sure.

And this feel­ing writerly / rit­terly is on top of imag­in­ing my writ­ing skills as some form of dog, inspired by a cow. It gets quite noisy, and messy, in my head some­times. Lots of paws for thought. I said, ‘lots of paws for thought’. Oh all right, suit yourselves.

Yes, it’s ani­mal month in the Ivan imag­i­na­tion. In the novel so far we have mon­keys, seag­ulls, crows, pigeons and a rab­bit. And, obvi­ously, the first law being write about what you know, it’s drinks year. Those already named include whisky, port, Guin­ness, rum and vodka.  Per­haps I should aban­don all attempts at fic­tion and sim­ply pro­duce lists of things. I’d need a hook, though. Some vari­a­tion of ‘The most crap top-tens for un-adventurous boys in 2010 ever’. Yes, that will get me published.

Although now that I think about it — yes, dear reader, the poor sod writ­ing this actu­ally thinks like this — I should name some of the drinks that Tom erm, drinks, after ani­mals.  Which would nor­mally be the per­fect excuse to lose myself in the intertron for a cou­ple of hours research­ing animal-themed names for drinks that have some loose con­nec­tion with children’s sto­ries. (Feel free to com­ment if any spring to mind).

But I digress. Of course. This is half the point of my writ­ing. To wan­der around. Turn the cor­ner. Open cup­boards. See what’s inside.

Of course there are dif­fer­ent def­i­n­i­tions of ‘writer’.  To a degree, I get paid for putting one word in front of another. It’s just that they’re not nec­es­sar­ily Eng­lish, and they tend to have more logic and struc­ture than my fic­tion. They’re also, mer­ci­fully, shorter.

I have yet to meet another def­i­n­i­tion of ‘writer’ — that of being referred to as ‘a writer’. My great­est envy/pleasure at the moment, is that my friend-through-marriage As is referred to as a film-maker.  All the prizes he’s won don’t help (the envy) but it’s the plain old sim­ple intro­duc­tion that I’m most jeal­ous of. ‘He makes films’. One day — one day I’ll be referred to as ‘he writes books’. Until then, it’s plain old ‘puts some funny stuff in email / on his blog / gib­ber jab­bers like a crazy fool’. Sigh.  That’s a long old Native Amer­i­can name.

But in the sense that I’m ‘work­ing at writ­ing’ — that I now write most days, in vol­ume and vaguely to a plan. Well, yes. I am a writer. I need a few hun­dred words to warm up — hence this post about noth­ing, but I do feel a bit more of a writer than I used to. And that’s mainly down to rou­tine. To work. And a lit­tle dis­ci­pline. I take the knocks a lit­tle eas­ier now. I don’t let myself by side-tracked so much. I don’t spend hours lost in research­ing the name of a pub or per­son who only appears in book­space for two paragraphs.

I can’t remem­ber if I’ve blogged this before, but Doc­torow has a good tip — if you are in the flow of some­thing and you need to look up a ref­er­ence, sim­ply star it (or in my case I type *ele­phant*, as I’m pretty sure I won’t write about ele­phants.  I mean, I’m not say­ing never, a gig’s a gig, but for the most part, my ani­mals are domes­tic.  Hmm, except I’ve just realised the first time you meet the main char­ac­ter he’s dressed as a leop­ard.  But that’s just Tom. You get used to him. It’s the kind of thing he does.)  Any­way — *ele­phants* — means you can keep writ­ing the rest of the sen­tence / story with­out break­ing off to lose your­self in the wik­i­fac­etwit­verse look­ing up triv­ial details.
And it works. Except when you send a scene off for sense-checking proof­ing and realise that the priest* (I was unsure as to whether priests can/do officiate/speak/wander around in that Eng­lish vicar tra­di­tion at civil cre­ma­to­ri­ums) is still referred to as an ele­phant.  Of course, it says some­thing about these read­ers’ tol­er­ance of my writ­ing that it did not strike them as odd that the per­son con­duct­ing the ser­vice was an elephant.
*Actu­ally, I haven’t for­mally estab­lished this yet either.  But see­ing as this hap­pens about half way through the novel, and I want to fin­ish the bloody thing first, it will just have to wait. So a priest in an ele­phant mask it is.
I sup­pose I should be proud of this. Get a badge made: ‘Can write pachy­derms into main story arc with­out con­fus­ing reader’. Bit of a mouth­ful for a badge. Per­haps a cer­tifi­cate? I could frame it next to the one that says ‘Ivan has devel­oped a writ­ing rou­tine that seems to work and he’s now over 30,000 words into the novel.’
So there you have it — my writ­ing rou­tine. Dream­ing up prizes for myself while anthro­po­mor­phis­ing well-loved ani­mals (and cows), observ­ing my tea get cold like a lost tourist in this strangely dis­or­gan­ised place.  And let­ting my four typ­ing fin­gers dance around a bit and hope they will mag­i­cally co-operate and pro­duce some­thing coher­ent, as ren­dered by dots on a screen. My other fin­gers get jeal­ous, and try to trip them up every now and again. Which is why you hear ‘click click click’ so often if you hear me type — it’s the back­space key.  The music of error — the music of chance.
Right. To writ­ing. Now that the brain is func­tion­ing (ha!), the *ele­phants* are back in the cup­board and I’m used to the clack­ing sound on the keys, it’s time to fire up the mighty Mog­wai and make Tom have an awk­ward con­ver­sa­tion with a man about a piano, qua­dratic equa­tions and old copies of the Rac­ing Post.
And per­haps it’s time to write some mog­wais into the story too.  They can join the mcguffins.