<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Monk Quixote</title>
	<atom:link href="http://monkquixote.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://monkquixote.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 05:12:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Narrative voice — help please.… by pldcgptprik</title>
		<link>http://monkquixote.com/2008/11/17/narrative-voice-help-please/comment-page-1/#comment-8144</link>
		<dc:creator>pldcgptprik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 05:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://monkquixote.com/?p=172#comment-8144</guid>
		<description>WKxRohrKk &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.golfzonediscount.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Ping G20&lt;/a&gt; vhshiPfARjgywMDC</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WKxRohrKk <a href="http://www.golfzonediscount.com" rel="nofollow">Ping G20</a> vhshiPfARjgywMDC</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Writer vs storyteller by Zoe</title>
		<link>http://monkquixote.com/2011/11/29/writer-vs-storyteller/comment-page-1/#comment-7505</link>
		<dc:creator>Zoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 11:51:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://monkquixote.com/?p=611#comment-7505</guid>
		<description>Hi Monki

I think it&#039;s a spectrum - on one end there are things which are carried solely by the style and have almost no plot, but are nonetheless serious writing - and then on the other end things that are extremely plot-driven, not necessarily well written, but extremely *readable* (Martina Cole?!).

Personally I think the sweet spot is somewhere in the middle. I think something like Lolita is an example of something balancing style/plot - really pacey, gripping, and undeniably well written. 

On plot being too far out - I&#039;m not sure this is possible, as long as the suspension of disbelief required of the reader is consistent and the plot itself is internally coherent. 

- Zoe (auburnette on Fetch)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Monki</p>
<p>I think it’s a spectrum — on one end there are things which are carried solely by the style and have almost no plot, but are nonetheless serious writing — and then on the other end things that are extremely plot-driven, not necessarily well written, but extremely *readable* (Martina Cole?!).</p>
<p>Personally I think the sweet spot is somewhere in the middle. I think something like Lolita is an example of something balancing style/plot — really pacey, gripping, and undeniably well written. </p>
<p>On plot being too far out — I’m not sure this is possible, as long as the suspension of disbelief required of the reader is consistent and the plot itself is internally coherent. </p>
<p>- Zoe (auburnette on Fetch)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Tom’s Universe — the novel (extinct, dead, no more, deceased) by Jae Hong</title>
		<link>http://monkquixote.com/toms-universe/comment-page-1/#comment-2404</link>
		<dc:creator>Jae Hong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 19:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://monkquixote.com/?page_id=472#comment-2404</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m hooked.  Reel me in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m hooked.  Reel me in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

