Writer’s woe

*Updated and edited for clarity*

I have decided, with a typ­i­cally male lack of need for sci­en­tific, or indeed, observ­able, cor­rob­o­ra­tion, that I have writer’s woe. It’s a bit like ten­nis elbow, or runner’s knee, but much more French.

In the past cou­ple of weeks I have been think­ing about, lis­ten­ing it and read­ing around a lot of pro­fes­sional advice on how to get pub­lished. In particular:

  • The LBF Mas­ter­class that I’ve already posted about — although the more I think about the £40 plus travel, for two hours of informed, but ulti­mately nei­ther spe­cific nor novel (no pun intended, I already own @caroleagent’s excel­lent From Pitch to Pub­li­ca­tion) advice, I do think this was incor­rect­edly adver­tised as a ‘class’ and con­se­quently overpriced;
  • The slightly odd expe­ri­ence of win­ning a place (via twit­ter) on the cur­rent Lon­don Writ­ers Club Fic­tion Mas­ter­class — on the strength of my revised pitch for the novel, itself revised because of some­thing Car­ole Blake said at the event I’ve just been slightly sniffy about, so in some ways I’m £57 up on mas­ter­classes at present. Strictly speak­ing I think this is the first thing I’ve ‘won’ as an adult fic­tion writer.
  • Meet­ing one of my heroes — Ian Rankin — nutch­ing about the qual­ity of High­land Park and on writ­ing to instru­men­tal music. I lis­tened to him being inter­viewed at LBF (and then repeat the same anec­dotes on a comics panel later that day) — and I thought ‘here’s a man who doesn’t care what his hair looks like, drink­ing a free pint, telling sto­ries about him­self and the peo­ple in his head.’ Yes, dear reader, there was a wist­ful sigh at this point.

The LWC Mas­ter­class is a series of tele-conferences — one a week. Ini­tially, this felt a bit odd, as it reminded me a lit­tle of my old job — but Miranda Glover’s lec­ture was deliv­ered in such sooth­ing and pol­ished tones that it was occa­sion­ally dif­fi­cult to remem­ber I had a hand­set on loud­speaker, and that I wasn’t lis­ten­ing to the radio. It’s a tes­ta­ment to the amount she packed in to her ini­tial slot that I filled sev­eral pages with notes — she cov­ered a lot of the basics, but also went into quite spe­cific details as to process and her tech­nique, using exam­ples from her own career to back up her points.

I’m always impressed by authors who give some­thing back — Glover not only runs a writ­ing group, she has also set up her own Press. I was really impressed by the way she addressed the Q&A bit, being both highly spe­cific and mak­ing peo­ple feel that she was inter­ested in their work, their issues and gen­uinely try­ing to help. Not all authors I’ve met or paid to hear have been so magnanimous.

More impor­tantly, per­haps, is that unlike so many other bits of advice I’ve read/paid for/ lis­tened to or sim­ply been on the end of in the pub/facebook/twitter (just as every­one thinks that they have a book in them, lots of peo­ple also have an opin­ion as to what you should be writ­ing, or how, I’ve dis­cov­ered), I put some of what she said into imme­di­ate action. I was also helped by some­thing Jacque­line Burns, who co-runs LWC, said — sug­gest­ing I approach my immi­nent readthrough of the novel with one very spe­cific ques­tion in mind (doing sev­eral if needs be).

Sadly, the net result has been writer’s woe. I cur­rently hate — ooh, 90% — of the novel, I’d say. Hav­ing put it in a drawer for a few months, I’ve since dis­cov­ered that the lead char­ac­ter spends most of his time drunk, grasp­ing people’s shoul­ders, trac­ing out­lines of text or pic­tures. Pigeons always bob. Com­put­ers always mechan­i­cally wheeze into action. And var­i­ous things are con­sti­pated. It is the fate of all artists to strug­gle with their cre­ations, I suppose.

And Glover again came up trumps for this sce­nario — declar­ing that the draft­ing process was only fin­ished when she felt ready to move on to another story. When there was noth­ing left.

With­out men­tion­ing the shape-shifting dogs, ran­dom cliff-hangers, and the very obvi­ously episodic way I’d writ­ten it. The embar­rass­ment is that I really thought this was good enough to go out to peo­ple — and it so obvi­ously isn’t, now that I read it as a whole, on paper, and with­out the rose-tinted glasses of fin­ish­ing the damn thing.

Because I haven’t. Fin­ished, that is. As she said, the end of the first draft is a momen­tous thing, but it’s only the start of the next round of the process.

So much of all of this process stuff is sub­jec­tive — when it makes sense, it just makes sense… oth­ers will dis­agree wildly. One of my — per­haps male, per­haps not — crit­i­cisms of a lot of sem­i­nars I’ve attended, cre­ative writ­ing and oth­er­wise, is that peo­ple aren’t spe­cific or detailed enough.  The ini­tial talk / lec­ture there­fore gave me plenty of mate­r­ial to chew over, and made me feel that Miranda was gen­uinely inter­ested in improv­ing the writ­ing / process of others.

In par­tic­u­lar I loved three things she said which I hope I cap­tured correctly:

- writ­ing a novel is a com­mit­ment, like join­ing a gym. (My exten­sion — I go through reg­u­lar gym-fixations, but equally months of gym-avoidance. I need to make the most of my short-term focus). Because:
– you have a rela­tion­ship with your novel (and within the novel with your char­ac­ters and your read­ers); which in turn explains:
– you’re fin­ished only when you feel ready to move on (again, my anal­ogy — I’d fallen out of love with my novel, but the rela­tion­ship is worth saving).

I liked that she wasn’t afraid to give advice, could back things up from per­sonal expe­ri­ence, and did so with grace and enthu­si­asm. I’ve yet to meet or lis­ten to an author that I haven’t learnt *some­thing* from, but it’s rare to get so much in such a short space of time — with­out feel­ing patro­n­ised or naive or ‘why the hell didn’t I take this more seri­ously earlier’.

The next class (Emma Rose, out of sequence) was on the pub­lish­ing process, some­thing that I am sadly already inti­mate with, hav­ing started my grown up career as the web ‘guy’ for a major aca­d­e­mic pub­lisher. Funny how lit­tle has changed over the years, and how much the text­book and ELT mar­kets (ruth­less, in all senses) led the way. Lit­tle did I imag­ine that I would ever pic­ture myself as an aca­d­e­mic mono­graph, wait­ing to be found and filed in some dusty library somewhere.

And tonight I am attend­ing the LWC Live event with Lucy Luck. Let’s see how grim the mar­ket really is for ‘Lon­don com­muter belt Iain Banks-esque fam­ily dramas’.

Woe, indeed.

Leave a comment