Time, talent, tenacity, desire. And guns.

While watch­ing the death throes of the Mur­ray vs Nadal ten­nis match yes­ter­day I was left won­der­ing about the former’s will to win. Both men are pro­fes­sional ath­letes, roughly the same age — they even trained together as chid­dlers. Both are suc­cess­ful (or at least in pure cash terms both have won more than £1m in prize money), have impres­sive biceps and are blessed with a fair degree of nat­ural tal­ent. Yet there was only going to be one win­ner out there. The desire of one player seemed to crush the other almost before they stepped on the court. It’s not all that sep­a­rates them, obvi­ously, but it looked like it was a large part.

I can play a bit of ten­nis. But I’ve never prac­tised for hours. Or worn a ban­dana. Or curt­seyed to Princess Michael of Kent (not exactly a perk of the job). I sim­ply don’t think I’ve ever wanted to _win_. Not in the way that Nadal does. I like to beat peo­ple, but these are usu­ally spe­cific peo­ple. I don’t play to win. I play to enjoy myself. Ulti­mately, this has meant that I have never trained in the way that he / Mur­ray do or made the sac­ri­fices that they have. Or ben­e­fit from the rewards.

Which led to me think­ing about my ‘malaise’ in gen­eral. As men­tioned pas­sim, an old Eng­lish teacher has cre­ative writ­ing as down to three things — time and tal­ent and tenac­ity? Do I really lack any of these? Or is it some­thing sim­pler, more basic? Do I want to be cre­ative? In the ‘win­ning things’ way — whether that’s a con­tract or a prize or what­ever? Or do I sim­ply want to play the odd knock-up game of serve-and-verb and not bother the scor­ers at the end of the day? And if not, why not?

I spend a lot of my work­ing life using the phrase ‘the thing that really frus­trates me is.…’. And for all the win­dow dress­ing in the world, it’s ulti­mately ‘me’. I have no rea­son to be doing what I’m doing. I have no rea­son to be say­ing ‘the thing that really frus­trates me is.…’. I have choices, thank­fully. And the most obvi­ous would be to use my lin­guis­tic dex­ter­ity for some nobler pur­pose than to amuse peo­ple on social net­works with just how many units it can take to touch-type.

I’m a project-based pro­fes­sional. I’m a project-based per­son. I have the tenac­ity (not quite as good as He-Man, but I’m work­ing on it). I’m per­fectly capa­ble of being a stub­born and con­trary so-and-so until the project is fin­ished (or more fre­quently until the fin­ish line is in sight and then I lose inter­est). What I strug­gle to do, par­tic­u­larly in my cre­ative work, is to build on these projects towards a big­ger goal. (Whereas Nadal can evi­dently both focus on the mile­stones in a tour­na­ment (the indi­vid­ual matches) together with the over­all ‘project’ of becom­ing #1 in the world. And Mur­ray is per­haps bet­ter at the individual. )

I won­der how I can turn get­ting the nov­els out of my head into some­thing like a series of man­age­able chunks, par­tic­u­larly when my ‘nat­ural’ ten­dency is to intro­duce com­plex­ity, not reduce it. (Obvi­ously my biggest nat­ural ten­dency is to find ever-more-convoluted ways to whine about not writ­ing, while in some form of tragic irony, writing).

Even my attempt to write a series of short sto­ries has been sab­o­taged by my ‘nat­ural’ desire to (a) clus­ter them around a theme; (b) share char­ac­ters across sto­ries and © put them into the Monk Quixote uni­verse. But still, if you can’t stand around on the tube self-consciously attempt­ing to not write like a dyslexic chimp in shiny pur­ple ink in a very old moleskine.

Sigh. Any­hoo, long self-indulgent post (aren’t they all) pon­der­ing on how to get those word counts mov­ing. No-one else will write this for me. And even if they did, it’s not the point.

Slowly, some­thing stirs in the for­est. Let us see whether it is an ant or a bear.

3 Comments on “Time, talent, tenacity, desire. And guns.”

  1. it’s a bear. with a sore head. if a bear trips over a log in a for­est and there’s nobody there to hear it, does he still utter a stream of exple­tives? and did he use up all the toi­let roll? and has the pope been notified?

  2. Ivan says:

    It’s a blog, Lau­rence. You’re not meant to read it. :o) Regard­less of catholic intent. The Pope wears some form of designer footwear appar­ently. As you do. As bears do.

  3. Are you accus­ing me of crap­ping in the woods? That’s prac­ti­cally a hang­ing offence around here.

    Lis­ten, do you want me to read some of the stuff that you’re resist­ing work­ing on?

Leave a comment