Meh, or, if you could be any tree in the verse, what kind of tree would you be?

Stress. Is rel­a­tive. Or to be more accu­rate. Stress is rel­a­tives. And what with every­thing being rel­a­tive, well that would mean that stress is all around us. But if love, actu­ally, is all around us, then that would mean that stress equals love and all around (ie every­where) would be rel­a­tive. Which could be a prob­lem, as at any time I may turn into a square MC, and slam dunk the funk.

If I were to dunk the funk, then I would prob­a­bly trig­ger some kind of worm­hole, by simul­ta­ne­ously prov­ing that con­tin­uum is con­tigu­ous and the rhyth­mym is mel­liflu­ous. And pos­si­bly super­flu­ous. But never vis­cous. Betty Boo is doing the do and there’s noth­ing you can do. Unless you’re a rel­a­tive, in which case pro­ceed to Go via the stair upon which a lit­tle mouse is sit­ting on, right there.

A lit­tle mouse. With clogs on. Well. It sure beats dunk­ing the funk­ing. And if you don’t like, what you see here, get the funk out. Although out itself is rel­a­tive, as we have already proved, see words passim.

Pas­sim is as pas­sim does. Et tu Bru­tus. Yes, for are we not all rel­a­tives on the space­ship Funkadelic.

And then the pic­tures of the kit­tens arrived and all was well. You can’t beat me, stress. No, no, no. Try to send a man to rehab, I say no, no, no. Or, as I am, actu­ally, rel­a­tively well around, I say.

Maybe. That is all.

Leave a comment